True Reconstruction

Re-Imagined by Socrakeys

www.thisomnivore.wordpress.com

The USA nation faces a few hard years of serious reconstruction, very much like the reconstruction that took place after the Civil War. We are not yet out of the long economic civil wars that have riddled the USA in this last decade, with dot-corn collapse, corporate scandals, housing speculation, and failed bailouts. The Deep-Recession-Depression (DRD 2011) will peak in 2011 (the first year of the decade, as all previous recessions: 2001, 1991, 1981, 1971, 1961, 1951, 1941, 1931, and so on): however, unemployment figures will remain high even after that, probably until year 2014. The worst dramatic and destructive recessions occur every forty years (1931 with the Great Depression; 1971 with the Total Collapse of the Bretton-Woods-Gold-Parity $35/ounce; 2011 with the Final End of the USA Economic Empire). The year 2011 will be ten years after the dot-corn pump-and-dump depression of 2001, which in turn was ten years after the 1991 debacle of thrifts-and-loans (which followed by 4 years the Wall Street crash of 1987, and the subsequent puncture of the Japanese balloon), which was ten years after the 1981 recession (with interest rates at 17%) that brought in the horrifying Reaganomics-trickle-down period, respectively ten years after the 1971 Vietnam fiasco and the petro-dolla r-hyper-inflation following the Bretton-Woods dollar-gold parity implosion, which occurred just in 1971. Even 1961 was a recession period, when the bottom was touched after the 1957-58 contraction and before the expansion of the sixties, and ten years earlier, in 1951, the dramatic recession was partially halted by the effects of the Korean war In 1941, that dramatic recession was halted by the effects of Pearl Harbor and World War Two, and the Great Depression of ten years earlier, in 1931, is still today sending its dark shadows onto the whole planet. 1921 was also a recession year, with the global economy falling very sharply. At present, the rate of private domestic investments as a percentage of the national gross domestic product is still falling (it was 11% in 1991, and 15% in 2001): it is currently at 16%, and it might even be down close to zero by year 2011, with nobody willing to invest in the productive sector of the USA. The bailouts of banks and car manufacturers failed, primarily because top-heavy trickle-down measures cannot work, as those faulty financial models were themselves among the causes of the current deep-recession-depression. To begin a build-uji commencing with infrastructure and energy would be equivalent to repeating the error of a top-down approach. The national reconstruction effort will have to start with the housing industry, and then continue with the healthcare industry, the education industry, and finally the public safety industry. Guaranteeing adequate housing to each citizen would require an annual output for the government of $3 trillion ($10,000 per person per year for 300 million people). It would, for instance, give a housing value of $40,000 to a family of four. It would be a gradual but constant effort consisting in taking over the housing industry, and guara nteeing jobs in housing development, construction, maintenance, rentals, furniture industries, appliance industries, utilities, etc., all centralized and regulated. A total of 11.5 million people would be employed altogether in the housing industry, at a salary of $130,000 per person, at a cost for the Treasury of $1.5 trillion per year (which is actually a much smaller figure than the bailouts). This scenario sets the output-input ratio at two to one: $260,000 value of annual output from each employed person, for $130,000 of annual wages paid to each employee. The next step of the reconstruction process would be to guarantee adequate healthcare to each citizen, which would require an annual output for the government of $3 trillion ($10,000 on average per person per year for 300 million people). It would be a gradual and constant effort, consisting in taking over the healthcare industry, and guaranteeing jobs in hospitals, clinics, HMOs, laboratories, pharmacies, pharmaceutical companies, research institutes, health insurance providers, etc., all centralized and regulated. Also the function of guaranteed elderqare would be included in the healthcare industry. So 11.5 million people would be in all employed in the healthcare industry, at an annual salary of $130,000 per person, at a cost for the Treasury of $1.5 trillion per year (again, a much smaller figure than the bailouts, which together totaled some $8 trillion). This scenario too sets the output-input ratio at two to one: $260,000 value of annual output per employee for $130,000 of annual salary. As part of the healthcare industry, the regulated eldercare industry will serve 15 million people (ages over 85) for an average service value of $30,000 per person per year, and will employ 1.7 million people at a salary of $130,000 per person, with a production output value of $260,000 per person, at a total cost for the Treasury of $220 billion. The reconstruction would then continue with the education industry, guaranteeing free education (including college, university, graduate and post-graduate studies) to each citizen between ages 5 to 25, and free childcare, kindergarten, and preschool before that. This industry would require an annual output for the government of $3 trillion ($30,000 on average per student per year for 100 million youth). It would be a consistent effort gradually taking over all schools, colleges, universities, textbook publishing companies, etc., all centralized and regulated. Also the function of guaranteed childcare, kindergarten, and preschool (for ages 0 to 5) would be included in the education industry. Some 11.5 million people would be employed in the education industry, at a salary of $130,000 per person per year, at a total cost for the Treasury of $1.5 trillion per year (a much smaller figure than the total bank/car bailouts). Also this scenario sets the output-input ratio at two to one: $260,000 value of annual measured output per person for $130,000 of annual salary input. The reconstruction would then encompass also the public safety industry, which will require a high degree of social maturity. The public safety industry would include all public safety and public administration services, including Treasury, police, courts, defense, military installations, diplomatic corps, security, surveillance, intelligence, postal service, delivery services, fire protection, insurance services, etc., all centralized and regulated. Much of the workforce for the public safety industry will come from the citizens’ public service in the public forces, a program that would require each citizen to serve 5 years, not necessarily consecutively, between the ages 25 to 75, in the public forces, at a full pay of $130,000 per year The regulated public safety industry will serve 300 million people for an estimated average service value of $13,000 per person per year The public service of all citizens in the public forces for 5 years between ages 25 and 75, totaling 15 Million people in service at any given time, will lead to an annual cost for the Treasury of some $2 trillion (the cost of $130,000 in annual salary for each enrolled citizen) obtaining a value of service output measured at $3.9 trillion ($260,000 of measured value of output generated by each enrolled individual). So the reconstruction phase would be completed, with guaranteed services in the fundamental areas of basic human rights (housing, healthcare, education, and public safety) and guaranteed employment in the industries of housing, healthcare, education, and public safety. The Treasury will have annual costs of $1.5 trillion for housing, $1.5 trillion for healthcare, $220 billion for eldercare, $1.5 trillion for childcare and education, and $2 trillion for public service, totaling thus a budget of some $6.7 trillion per year There will be a fiat national income tax of 40%, with no other forms of taxes levied. This rate is a lower tax than the current total tax rate, which is currently 25% federal tax, 5% state tax, 7.5% sales tax, and 7.5% payroll tax (the portion paid by the employee), totaling now some 45% in taxes, plus property taxes and other current taxation. So, the proposed 40% fiat tax rate would be visibly lower. At a tax rate of 40%, the Treasury will have yearly revenues of $7.8 trillion (40% of $130,000 of annual income each for 150 million persons), revenues which well exceed the annual budgeted total expenditures of $6.7 trillion. A total of 50 million people will be employed in the public regulated industries (housing, healthcare, education, and public safety). Another 100 million people will be employed in the monitored industries. Monitored industries will comprise all industries that provide goods and services not related to the healthcare industry, the education industry, the housing industry, or the public safety industry: the monitored industries would include, e. g., food, clothing, distribution, information, entertainment, energy, communication, transportation, infrastructure, export, import, etc. The monitored industries are not financed by the Treasury, but all the employees of the monitored industries are entitled to receive full pay and are protected from exploitative practices (the output-input ratio of two to one would apply also to the monitored industries). All the monitored industries will be continuously audited by the Treasury for compliance with plans, productivity, and compensation. It will be a four-year bottom-up build-up process of hard work and rewarding achievements, culminating in an efficient social system that provides work to all, and that guarantees the basic human rights of housing, healthcare, education, and public safety for all. The annual national gross domestic product (which includes both regulated industries and monitored industries) will have moved from the current $16 trillion to $20 trillion, and the government’s annual budget will have risen from $4 trillion to $8 trillion, ensuring stability and progress for the whole nation. The USA nation is indeed facing tough times ahead, but by adopting a wise plan of reconstruction the whole nation can reach an extremely high social level, ensuring social dignity to all its citizens, and setting a leading example of wisdom and progress to all nations.

Check out my new company and blog at

www.honesthelp.org

and

www.thisomnivore.wordpress.com

See You There!

Latent Entrepreneur Personality Type (LEPT)

By: Sprig Allan

In a normal day to day conversation, the terms ADHD and entrepreneurship are completely unrelated.  For Deb Gilbertson, former corporate Marketing and Innovation Manager at the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, ADHD can be redefined as Latent Entrepreneur

Personality Type (LEPT). Gilbertson explores the concept that ADHD developed on an evolutionary standpoint to give hunters a mental advantage over their prey. LEPT allowed for the hunters to “see everything,” constantly on the look out for the next meal or threat.  This capacity to observe all, served them well in the hunt, but in the classroom it looks like inattention and distraction.

These rapid sifts in focus and high energy may hinder a person with LEPT in the classroom but in terms of entrepreneurship, this person is well equipped to deal with the challenges facing an entrepreneur. In ADHD people and young children, the frontal lobes are immature or sluggish, so they appear to act without thinking.  In adults it is characterized by restless energy, rapid onset of boredom and deficient short -term memory. It is also characterized by passion, utter commitment to areas if interest, creativity, resilience to setbacks, willingness to engage in moderate risk taking, slightly maverick behavior, eclectic experiences and high energy.

These qualities of being creative, insightful, breaking rules, making rules, reframing issues, and gaining meaning are characteristic of entrepreneurs, intrapreneurs and creative people. They are also a signature of ADHD.  Considering the fact that people with ADHD are four times more likely to be an entrepreneur than an average person, there is an obligation to notice the positive characteristics that LEPT individuals have and to encourage them to try entrepreneurship.

A quick comparison between the bootstrapping and deep pocket — fast burn strategies on how to start a business

By: Sprigley Allan, SDSU ‘11
Every year, over eight million entrepreneurs start businesses in the United States alone. Each one of these businesses needs an energetic entrepreneur, a strong work ethic, and a great idea but what they may not need is money. In the world of entrepreneurship, there are two potential approaches on the best way to finance a start—up. These are the bootstrap and the deep pocket — fast burn strategies.

Bootstrapping is for the entrepreneur that wants to spend as little money as possible to launch his/her venture quickly to see if the market exists for their product. This is a direct opposite of the deep pocket — fast burn strategy. This strategy is essential for companies that require large sums of money to be initially invested product marketing, advertising and product research and development before the product even reaches the market.

In today’s economic environment, it is becoming more difficult and time consuming to find large amounts of capital for new entrepreneurs and unproven products or services. However, this is no reason not to start your company now. With major companies maintaining a low profile to survive the current “storm” and additional talent now available, the time is perfect for new and adaptable companies to step in and thrive.

Bootstrapping allows for an entrepreneur to start a business without having to put themselves in a tremendous amount of debt and keeps them from giving up too much equity. Along with bootstrapping their business, the best thing a new entrepreneur can do is to make use of all the resources available.

Among the most powerful tools available on the internet are:

  • United States Small Business Administration
    This government funded and government run program can assist in all stages of starting a small business. Some of the 100’s of tools that their website provides are tools for writing a business plan, finding funding both in grants and connecting companies with investors both on a local and national scale.
  • Weebly
    This is a FREE, easy way to start marketing your product on the internet and generating some interest.
  • PayPal
    PayPal was itself started in 1998 by an entrepreneur in the attempt to provide a quick, inexpensive and user friendly mechanism for e-commerce.It is still one of the easiest ways to accept credit card payments securely online.
  • The Best Things in Life Are Free
    A comprehensive list of FREE online business resources that come in handy whether you are a bootstrapped company low on funds or simply a cost conscious CEO looking for affordable alternatives to brand named products.

This strategy is essential for companies that require large sums of money to be initially invested in marketing, advertising and product research and development before the product even reaches the market.

Maintaining ethics, morals and integrity in the modern business world

By: Sprigley Allan

Morality and ethics in business can be an interesting discussion.  You should not overlook the clear connections between entrepreneurial character traits and their related moral virtues.  A student interested in entrepreneurship is taught both, the practical traits of business success as well as the ethics and moral virtues they should stand for.  Although most conventional wisdom  suggests teaching these two topics as separate ideas, not all agree.  According to The Journal of Private Enterprise these topics should not only be taught together but that they are mutually supporting.

The following table itemizes both the necessary traits of a successful entrepreneur and the corresponding moral virtues.

Entrepreneurial Character Traits

Moral Virtue

Knowledge and Creativity Rationality
Ambition Pride
Guts Courage
Initiative Integrity
Perseverance Independence
Trial and Error Objectivity
Productivity Productiveness

Together the left and right side of the above chart constitutes an entrepreneurial code for business ethics.  According to The Journal of Private Enterprise, the list of virtues listed above is both very Aristotelian (Aristotle, 1984; see Aristotle’s discussions of courage in Book III, pride as the “crown” of the virtues, truthfulness, and liberality with respect to money in Book IV, justice in Book V, and phronesis or practical wisdom in Book VI of Nicomachean Ethics) and very Objectivist (Rand, 1964).

This conjunction of entrepreneurial traits and moral virtues shows the fallacy in believing that success according to business criteria and success according to ethical criteria can not be one in the same.  Whether entrepreneurs are developing their business plans, dealing with investors, employees, competitors or customers it is imperative that they have a strong foundation in ethical business practices.

Ethics are a classic example of something that rests on a slippery slope.  When an aspiring entrepreneur breaks any of these moral virtues or is deceitful in their business practice, the bottom line of their business ultimately reflects this.  To assure the respect of their employees, investors and customers an entrepreneur must follow an entrepreneurial code for business ethics.  What will you create?

Original copy at www.sdsu.edu/emc