A Succession plan is as important as having:

An Estate Plan

A Financial Plan

A Strategic Plan

Good succession/transition should encompass all four plans.  Every closely-held and family business company should have an exit strategy- What is yours?

Is your exit strategy written down or is it in your head?  Are you willing to sell your company and if not why not?

Could it be that your company is your legacy and that your dream is to perpetuate it through the generations?  But whose dream is it anyway because if it is not your next generations dream then your company may become a part of the statistics that say 92% of all companies in the USA are family owned and/or closely held but by the 2nd generation this drops to 34% and by the 3rd generation to 16%. BEWARE!!! Shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves in 3 generations could become your legacy!  If your successor does not have that fire in the belly, he/she is not going to succeed and he/she is certainly not going to successfully steward the company through to the next generation.

Once you establish who the successors are going to be then the next stage would be Leadership Development.  Successors acquire the needed leadership skills and experience and are acknowledged be employees and clients as the ones who will succeed.  The final stage would be the Transition.  This should be accomplished naturally to avoid ripples that could derail the succession.

Additional issues facing the success of any plan would be:

-       What will the ownership roles (if any) of the family members who are not active in the business?

-       If succession is split between two or more siblings and/or family members, what agreements should exist between shareholders that will allow for future changes e.g. Buy/Sell agreements?

-       Will minority ownership be allowed outside the family such as key employees, in-laws, public offerings?

-       Planning for transition to the next generation

-       Values and skills which the next generation will need in order to be prepared to accept the responsibility of caring for the family business.

-       What steps would be needed to help the next generation acquire those skills?

Suggestions for Successor Development

-       Assure yourself that family business entry is voluntary

-       Get meaningful, full-time outside work experience

-       Enter with a specific, needed, precedented job description and pay level

-       Prepare for a specific job that doesn’t exist yet

-       Be prepared to work harder than others I the company

-       Update you written personal development plan yearly

-       Review personal development plan with parents, siblings and key business advisors

-       Look for mentors inside and outside the business

-       Seek the presidency of an organization outside of work

-       Develop a peer group of young business presidents and family successors

-       Identify leadership models to emulate

-       Take jobs in a variety of functional jobs

-       Volunteer to make presentations to the board

-       Hire, evaluate and fire people as appropriate

-       Consider formal testing of current aptitudes, strengths and needs

-       Invest time in shared non-business interests with the family

-       Attempt to write down the company’s key strategic policies, management philosophies and cultural values

-       Remember that real authority comes from earning respect, not from power

-       Eventually identify your own future management team

-       Be a role model of listening skills, openness and change

Finally, what we encourage is “The Ethical Will.”  We use this tool to communicate the most sensitive issues of succession-issues that deal with retirement, death, legacies, family values and love.  These issues are passed on through the generations by an “Ethical Will.”

Imagine Walt Disney at the age of nineteen. His uncle asks him what he plans to do with his life, and he pulls out a drawing of a mouse and says, “I think this has a lot of potential.”

Or Springsteen. In a concert he once told the story of how he and his dad used to go at it — how his father hated his guitar. Late one night, Springsteen came home to find his father waiting up for him in the kitchen. His father asked him what he thought he was doing with himself. “And the worst part about it,” Springsteen says, “was I never knew how to explain it to him.” How does he tell his father, “I’m going to be Bruce Springsteen?”

Someone interviewed me a few months back for an entrepreneurship project, and he mentioned that in his conversations the thing that stood out most was the willingness of great entrepreneurs to be vulnerable. It’s not the first association you’d make with an entrepreneur. Words like “driven,” “ambitious,” and “persistent” usually come to mind. But the moment he said it I knew he’d hit the nail on the head.

Vulnerability. It is the most poignant quality in every entrepreneur I know.

There’s a misfit in each of us, and it’s the most delicate, precious thing that we have. Sadly, most people make it their life’s mission to hide it, to cover it over in the same clothes, the same work, the same “regurgitations,” as Thomas Merton wrote, as everyone else. This virus of homogenization has infected the landscape. Our backdrop in real life now mimics the scenery repetition you’d see in a Fred Flintstone cartoon as he drove down the street. But now it’s Home Depot-Walmart-McDonalds-Starbucks; Home Depot-Walmart-McDonalds-Starbucks; Home Depot-Walmart-McDonalds-Starbucks.

Ironic that all those enterprises were begun by entrepreneurs trying to do something different. And poignant that in the absence of Walt Disney himself, the Walt Disney Company just keeps building more Disneylands.

I used to visit the merry-go-round in Griffith Park in Los Angeles where Disney once took his daughters, asking himself, “Is this all there is? There has to be a better place to take my children.” And the rest is history. The great entrepreneur — the entrepreneur who really changes things — is the one who, in 2010, goes to Disneyland and asks the same question: “Is this all there is?” And the new world she or he will create as a result of that audacious inquiry is one that cannot possibly be conceived by people busy trying to fit into the world as it is.

To question the hegemony of merry-go-rounds — to actually care that there should be something more magnificent than a merry-go-round — is to be a misfit. I mean, who worries about these things? It reminds me of that scene in Annie Hall where the mother of a young Woody Allen takes him to a shrink and he says to the therapist, “How can I relax when the universe is expanding?” And his mother says, “You live in Brooklyn! Brooklyn isn’t expanding!” Talk about a misfit, right?

To embrace the misfit in oneself is to be vulnerable. It is to forsake the easy acceptance that comes with fitting in and to instead be fortified by a kind of love, really. A love of life, a love of wonder, and, ultimately, a sustaining love for oneself. Far from egoism, that love for oneself is a measure of one’s love for others, for humanity. And it is only from love that great ideas can be born.

This kind of love cannot be taught in business school. It has to be felt. It has to be given sanctuary away from the noise and relentless assault of information. And then it has to be nurtured. It must be embraced, in the light of day, for all to see, for people to ridicule, to criticize, to laugh at. And the entrepreneur has to be willing to feel the pain of that ridicule and suffer the risk of the dream being stolen, or crushed by the meanness of this world. But the misfit doesn’t worry about that. The misfit has a higher calling: to bring the unmanifest into being, no matter who is saying what.

Vulnerability is the absence of cynicism. And the absence of cynicism is love.

As that interviewer uttered the word “vulnerability,” I thought of some of my entrepreneur friends:Peter Diamandis who founded X Prize, Wayne Elsey who founded Souls4Soles, Billy Shore who created Share Our Strength, Brian Menzies who founded 1-800-CharityCars, Dennis Whittle who created Global Giving, Torie Osborn, who brought the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center into the twenty-first century.

And I realized that what separates them from others is their abject lack of cynicism. Their willingness to be vulnerable. Their love.

-

Dan Pallotta

Hey There Folks,
To make a real change in the world I believe you need to empower others to pursue their small change.  In other words here is the ultimate aquaponic cheat sheat that I am inviting you to use.  If you don’t want to build your own you can find these at www.HonestHelp.org!
For Hydropnics simply add nutrients as apose to the fish….
Socrakeys
DIY Aquaponics

This is a Yodio made by www.HonestHelp.org

True Reconstruction

Re-Imagined by Socrakeys

www.thisomnivore.wordpress.com

The USA nation faces a few hard years of serious reconstruction, very much like the reconstruction that took place after the Civil War. We are not yet out of the long economic civil wars that have riddled the USA in this last decade, with dot-corn collapse, corporate scandals, housing speculation, and failed bailouts. The Deep-Recession-Depression (DRD 2011) will peak in 2011 (the first year of the decade, as all previous recessions: 2001, 1991, 1981, 1971, 1961, 1951, 1941, 1931, and so on): however, unemployment figures will remain high even after that, probably until year 2014. The worst dramatic and destructive recessions occur every forty years (1931 with the Great Depression; 1971 with the Total Collapse of the Bretton-Woods-Gold-Parity $35/ounce; 2011 with the Final End of the USA Economic Empire). The year 2011 will be ten years after the dot-corn pump-and-dump depression of 2001, which in turn was ten years after the 1991 debacle of thrifts-and-loans (which followed by 4 years the Wall Street crash of 1987, and the subsequent puncture of the Japanese balloon), which was ten years after the 1981 recession (with interest rates at 17%) that brought in the horrifying Reaganomics-trickle-down period, respectively ten years after the 1971 Vietnam fiasco and the petro-dolla r-hyper-inflation following the Bretton-Woods dollar-gold parity implosion, which occurred just in 1971. Even 1961 was a recession period, when the bottom was touched after the 1957-58 contraction and before the expansion of the sixties, and ten years earlier, in 1951, the dramatic recession was partially halted by the effects of the Korean war In 1941, that dramatic recession was halted by the effects of Pearl Harbor and World War Two, and the Great Depression of ten years earlier, in 1931, is still today sending its dark shadows onto the whole planet. 1921 was also a recession year, with the global economy falling very sharply. At present, the rate of private domestic investments as a percentage of the national gross domestic product is still falling (it was 11% in 1991, and 15% in 2001): it is currently at 16%, and it might even be down close to zero by year 2011, with nobody willing to invest in the productive sector of the USA. The bailouts of banks and car manufacturers failed, primarily because top-heavy trickle-down measures cannot work, as those faulty financial models were themselves among the causes of the current deep-recession-depression. To begin a build-uji commencing with infrastructure and energy would be equivalent to repeating the error of a top-down approach. The national reconstruction effort will have to start with the housing industry, and then continue with the healthcare industry, the education industry, and finally the public safety industry. Guaranteeing adequate housing to each citizen would require an annual output for the government of $3 trillion ($10,000 per person per year for 300 million people). It would, for instance, give a housing value of $40,000 to a family of four. It would be a gradual but constant effort consisting in taking over the housing industry, and guara nteeing jobs in housing development, construction, maintenance, rentals, furniture industries, appliance industries, utilities, etc., all centralized and regulated. A total of 11.5 million people would be employed altogether in the housing industry, at a salary of $130,000 per person, at a cost for the Treasury of $1.5 trillion per year (which is actually a much smaller figure than the bailouts). This scenario sets the output-input ratio at two to one: $260,000 value of annual output from each employed person, for $130,000 of annual wages paid to each employee. The next step of the reconstruction process would be to guarantee adequate healthcare to each citizen, which would require an annual output for the government of $3 trillion ($10,000 on average per person per year for 300 million people). It would be a gradual and constant effort, consisting in taking over the healthcare industry, and guaranteeing jobs in hospitals, clinics, HMOs, laboratories, pharmacies, pharmaceutical companies, research institutes, health insurance providers, etc., all centralized and regulated. Also the function of guaranteed elderqare would be included in the healthcare industry. So 11.5 million people would be in all employed in the healthcare industry, at an annual salary of $130,000 per person, at a cost for the Treasury of $1.5 trillion per year (again, a much smaller figure than the bailouts, which together totaled some $8 trillion). This scenario too sets the output-input ratio at two to one: $260,000 value of annual output per employee for $130,000 of annual salary. As part of the healthcare industry, the regulated eldercare industry will serve 15 million people (ages over 85) for an average service value of $30,000 per person per year, and will employ 1.7 million people at a salary of $130,000 per person, with a production output value of $260,000 per person, at a total cost for the Treasury of $220 billion. The reconstruction would then continue with the education industry, guaranteeing free education (including college, university, graduate and post-graduate studies) to each citizen between ages 5 to 25, and free childcare, kindergarten, and preschool before that. This industry would require an annual output for the government of $3 trillion ($30,000 on average per student per year for 100 million youth). It would be a consistent effort gradually taking over all schools, colleges, universities, textbook publishing companies, etc., all centralized and regulated. Also the function of guaranteed childcare, kindergarten, and preschool (for ages 0 to 5) would be included in the education industry. Some 11.5 million people would be employed in the education industry, at a salary of $130,000 per person per year, at a total cost for the Treasury of $1.5 trillion per year (a much smaller figure than the total bank/car bailouts). Also this scenario sets the output-input ratio at two to one: $260,000 value of annual measured output per person for $130,000 of annual salary input. The reconstruction would then encompass also the public safety industry, which will require a high degree of social maturity. The public safety industry would include all public safety and public administration services, including Treasury, police, courts, defense, military installations, diplomatic corps, security, surveillance, intelligence, postal service, delivery services, fire protection, insurance services, etc., all centralized and regulated. Much of the workforce for the public safety industry will come from the citizens’ public service in the public forces, a program that would require each citizen to serve 5 years, not necessarily consecutively, between the ages 25 to 75, in the public forces, at a full pay of $130,000 per year The regulated public safety industry will serve 300 million people for an estimated average service value of $13,000 per person per year The public service of all citizens in the public forces for 5 years between ages 25 and 75, totaling 15 Million people in service at any given time, will lead to an annual cost for the Treasury of some $2 trillion (the cost of $130,000 in annual salary for each enrolled citizen) obtaining a value of service output measured at $3.9 trillion ($260,000 of measured value of output generated by each enrolled individual). So the reconstruction phase would be completed, with guaranteed services in the fundamental areas of basic human rights (housing, healthcare, education, and public safety) and guaranteed employment in the industries of housing, healthcare, education, and public safety. The Treasury will have annual costs of $1.5 trillion for housing, $1.5 trillion for healthcare, $220 billion for eldercare, $1.5 trillion for childcare and education, and $2 trillion for public service, totaling thus a budget of some $6.7 trillion per year There will be a fiat national income tax of 40%, with no other forms of taxes levied. This rate is a lower tax than the current total tax rate, which is currently 25% federal tax, 5% state tax, 7.5% sales tax, and 7.5% payroll tax (the portion paid by the employee), totaling now some 45% in taxes, plus property taxes and other current taxation. So, the proposed 40% fiat tax rate would be visibly lower. At a tax rate of 40%, the Treasury will have yearly revenues of $7.8 trillion (40% of $130,000 of annual income each for 150 million persons), revenues which well exceed the annual budgeted total expenditures of $6.7 trillion. A total of 50 million people will be employed in the public regulated industries (housing, healthcare, education, and public safety). Another 100 million people will be employed in the monitored industries. Monitored industries will comprise all industries that provide goods and services not related to the healthcare industry, the education industry, the housing industry, or the public safety industry: the monitored industries would include, e. g., food, clothing, distribution, information, entertainment, energy, communication, transportation, infrastructure, export, import, etc. The monitored industries are not financed by the Treasury, but all the employees of the monitored industries are entitled to receive full pay and are protected from exploitative practices (the output-input ratio of two to one would apply also to the monitored industries). All the monitored industries will be continuously audited by the Treasury for compliance with plans, productivity, and compensation. It will be a four-year bottom-up build-up process of hard work and rewarding achievements, culminating in an efficient social system that provides work to all, and that guarantees the basic human rights of housing, healthcare, education, and public safety for all. The annual national gross domestic product (which includes both regulated industries and monitored industries) will have moved from the current $16 trillion to $20 trillion, and the government’s annual budget will have risen from $4 trillion to $8 trillion, ensuring stability and progress for the whole nation. The USA nation is indeed facing tough times ahead, but by adopting a wise plan of reconstruction the whole nation can reach an extremely high social level, ensuring social dignity to all its citizens, and setting a leading example of wisdom and progress to all nations.

Check out my new company and blog at

www.honesthelp.org

and

www.thisomnivore.wordpress.com

See You There!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.